Monthly Archives: November 2015

BURMA ELECTIONS RIPPLE EFFECT IN THE REGION

image

It is not an illusion but a strong possibility.

What social media in China is talking about?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/burmas-election-leaves-former-patron-china-with-uncomfortable-questions/2015/11/11/337c7fe6-831f-468d-8a08-4b26f528d217_story.html

In Cambodia, social media is talking about the same topic and generating debates the same way as in China, making the ruling party sensitive.

The ripple effect in Cambodia

http://m.phnompenhpost.com/national/myanmar-opposition-victory-resonates-cambodia

Supporters of Cambodia opposition- Cambodia National Rescue Party at a post 2013 election rally in Phnom Penh

Supporters of Cambodia opposition- Cambodia National Rescue Party at a post 2013 election rally in Phnom Penh

 

 

INTERNET BRINGS CHANGE AND DEMOCRACY IN BURMA – SAME, SAME IN CAMBODIA

image

” People are much more politicized. They turn to the Internet for information” , Aung San Suu Kyi on BBC

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34773858

Cambodia 2013 elections

image image image

POWER TO THE PEOPLE OF BURMA

image image imageimage

TO THE LIVING DICTATORS IN THE WORLD:

BALLOTS, NOT BULLETS.

DEMOCRACY AND JUSTICE WILL PREVAIL.

NEVER UNDER-ESTIMATE THE POWER OF THE PEOPLE.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/09/us-myanmar-election-idUSKCN0SW0TP20151109#SD2k0Kxjlg4j0m2u.97

Unspoken Sexual Assaults on Cambodian Boys

http://sea-globe.com/male-sexual-abuse-cambodia-southeast-asia-globe/

image

For True Democracy

This is for my parents – who would be so very proud to know that I have not failed them. And for my colleagues and all other activists – men and women – who are in Cambodian jails now for refusing to give in to oppression and to a facade of democracy.

image

JUSTICE FOR LAWMAKERS VERY UNLIKELY

The Cambodia Daily- Nov.06/2015

The Cambodia Daily- Nov.06/2015

This is totally unacceptable for the following reasons:

1/ it can never be an independent and neutral investigation;

2/ the words of the PM are a signal for the judges to decide on the final,decision;

3/ violence can never, never be justified;

4/ who,is the PM defending? Did he not condemn the act of violence when he appeared on TV?

5/ the attackers are known to be members of the armed forces or the body guard unit;

6/ why were the police not protecting the lawmakers under assault?

THIS SHOWS EVEN MORE THAT  THE UN MUST PLAY A ROLE IF THE LAWMAKERS ARE TO RECIEVE JUSTICE.

IF THE SPOKESPERSON OF THE  MINISTRY OF INTERIOR SAYS THAT HE  WOULD HAVE ” USED A GUN” ON THE LAWMAKERS, THE INVESTIGATING TEAM SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE DISSOLVED AND THE SPOKESPERSON SHOULD RESIGN. THEY ARE ALL FROM THE SAME INSTITUTION.

CNRP SENIOR LAWMAKERS APPROACHED DEPUTY-PRIME  MINISTER SAR KHENG TO WARN HIM OF POSSIBLE UNREST BUT HE DID NOT TAKE ACTION. THERE WERE SIGNS OF TROUBLE WHEN THERE WAS CLOSE TO NO POLICE PRESENCE OUTSIDE THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ON 26 October.